Reference for Rosh Hashanah 12:18
ולא פליגי הא בתם
this excludes the heir. But this 'me'imak' is required to bring under the rule gleanings, forgotten sheaves, and corners of the field?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 11.');"><sup>25</sup></span> - I expound 'imak, and I expound me'imak.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'Imak' means 'from thee', and this would be sufficient for the rule; we therefore derive an additional lesson from the form me 'imak (lit., 'from with thee') .');"><sup>26</sup></span> R'Zera also asked: Does the rule of 'not delaying' apply to a woman? Do we reason that she is not obliged to appear [at Jerusalem on the festivals]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since it says, shall all thy males appear (Deut. XVI, 16) .');"><sup>27</sup></span> or perhaps do we reason that she is enjoined to rejoice?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which implies partaking of the peace-offerings. v. pes. 109a, and as she must go to Jerusalem for this purpose, she must also 'not delay' the vow'');"><sup>28</sup></span> - Abaye replied: Is not the answer provided by the fact that she is enjoined to rejoice? But could Abaye say this, seeing that Abaye has said that a woman is made joyful by her husband?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' With fine clothes, v. Kid. 34b.');"><sup>29</sup></span> Abaye was answering R'Zera on his own premises. The question was raised: From what day is the year of the firstling reckoned? - Abaye said, From the hour of its birth; R'Aha B'Jacob said, From the time when it can be used for appeasement.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., sacrifice, viz., on the eighth day, v. Lev. XXII, 27.');"><sup>30</sup></span> Nor is there any conflict of opinion between them; one speaks of an animal without blemish,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which can be sacrificed on the eighth day.');"><sup>31</sup></span>